Discussion about this post

User's avatar
ParanoidAndroid's avatar

Great writing, Oscar, thank you!

My back of envelope is that if they can penetrate the US market at even just $150m annual sales, for 50% EBIT margin, then $75m each year from US alone...even if you just put a modest 10x EV/EBIT multiple on that, we are talking EV of $1.5bn as opposed to what, $100m today even after the run-up? And that's from US sales alone, no royalties from other markets. Or am I delusional? Will the multiple be lower because this company is a one-trick pony and the patent protection will run out at a certain point? That is, by the way, a piece of the puzzle I haven't heard anyone discuss yet - any intel on how long they can keep protection for the asset?

By the way, anecdotal evidence - I am a heavy hiker and developed nail fungus myself a few years ago. A visit to a GP, and I was advised there are just more or less useless treatments on the market, and that, yes, I can try, but it will eventually just come back, because as a hiker with a lot of long sweaty feet walks, especially in the summer, I am a highly vulnerable group. So I just gave up. Yes, I am part of the undertreated group that will definitely buy Terclara once it reaches my market.

Expand full comment
Sean James's avatar

Hey Oscar, I really like your writing so thanks for sharing. I drew the same conclusion as you; from what I read, there were a lot of ifs. I always seem to lose whenever an investment relies on something happening. Definitely interesting and a lot of positives so will keep an eye on it.

Keep the articles coming!

Expand full comment
11 more comments...

No posts